LLM

スポンサーリンク
LLM

Token Harbor’s cache drop: is it fixed yet?

Token Harbor's pricing page now lists 4.9k+ requests for DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, up from 2.3k+. I re-ran 1,890 raw API calls against tokenharbor-p alone to see if the input cache drop is fixed.
LLM

OpenDesign DeepSeek Flash Eco: Where It Differs

960 requests comparing DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Eco against the standard Flash on OpenDesign Go. The no-trade-off claim holds and images still work, but the delay ranges from zero to six times depending on input length.
LLM

DeepSeek updated V4.1 Flash: fingerprint and effort levels changed

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash returned a new system_fingerprint on 2026-10-28. I re-measured the official API and OpenDesign, compared them with the October 15 record, and listed the reasoning_effort changes that came with it.
LLM

腱鞘炎の前に。M5Stackで音声入力するPC生活

エージェントへの指示でタイピング量が増え指が疲れてきたため、M5StackとSonioxの音声認識でMacに入力するデバイスを作りました。構成と音声認識サービス、実際の使用感をまとめます。
LLM

Token Harbor’s input cache silently stops hitting

DeepSeek's cheapest feature is its input cache, and Token Harbor seems to lose it mid-session. In 32 of 574 raw API calls the cache usage vanished, so the whole prompt looked like a full-price input charge.
LLM

Does Self-Hosting DeepSeek Pay Off for Mid-Size Companies

Based on the operating details DeepSeek disclosed with its inference infrastructure release, this post estimates what it costs a mid-size company to run DeepSeek locally and where the break-even point against API pricing sits.
LLM

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash (formerly Space Bunny) and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash compared on official pricing, specs, vendor benchmarks, and 60 runs of the same 10 tasks. The two cost the same and both passed everything.
LLM

We A/B tested a token-saving pi extension. It cost more

We measured the pi-rtk-optimizer extension with an isolated A/B test: extra compression was 0-0.7%, while turns and total cost went up by roughly 7%.
タイトルとURLをコピーしました